PHILOSOPHY OF THE ROSE

Preamble

Delicate in body yet of passionate invigoration in spirit, whereof the greatest bloom of the eye brought forth pain to that which palmed it, that great divine, they, the rose, where shall the spill of knowledge bring whence hereof, thus bequeathed the Philosophy of the Rose; Democratic Positivism;

Article I, Progenation

Section I, Dialectic

That it shall be recognized that all things may be described as a synthesis, of two opposing forces, a thesis and antithesis, which resolve in the process of contradiction whereafter all syntheses become new theses and antitheses which then continue to undergo contradiction in perpetuity;

Section II, Ontology

That it shall be recognized that even as all things exist in synthesis from the resolution of Quantums iteratively across the temporal dimension, the institution of discrete objects is a fiction of constructs which arbitrarily separates segments of instantaneous substance from the larger body which precipitates it and which it composes, but a fiction which may be maintained by the prescription of the Quantum, which is the least usefully divisible quality used in the reconstruction of a truth, which in their collection compose objects of unique qualities both absent on their individual components and inexorable from the nature of those components in tandem;

Section III, Temporality

That it shall be recognized that every temporal instance may be described as the resolution of all preceding instances in the process of resolving to the instances which will succeed it, which themselves are the resolution of their predecessors;

Section IV, Epistemology

That it shall be recognized that any formal system or method of perception not occurring as and in the direct instance of interest cannot undergo a transfer of absolute definition for that instance, and thus any definite recollection must be, inherently, of a derivative nature, and cannot, therefore, be used to definitively state a truth, even as truth can be approximated with greater precision as resolutions approach the final of infinite contradiction of Quantums;

Section V, Constructs

That it shall be recognized that the essence of the human species is the expression of the self as derived from preceding conditions when devoid of expected repatriation, whereof any such precipitant systems shall be defined as a culture from which arises distinctions which may be at times liberating or at times oppressive or in any instance both, being in any case utterly impeachable, whereof the covenant of the individual to the collective shall endear the individual to maintain the collective and the collective to facilitate the individual in negative liberties which are an absence of intervention in the pursuit of one’s desires and a positive liberties which are the provision of capital necessary in the realization of one’s desires;

Section VI, Multitudes

That it shall be recognized that the qualities of Quantums in tandem imbue the assemblages they compose with qualities surpassing that of the individual, whereof in numbers the meanings of contradiction become more poignant, and the inconceivable truth may be reconstructed as one may reconstruct a circle with straight lines;

Section VII, Humanism

That it shall be recognized that all individuals of the human species are essentially equal in nature or otherwise deserving to good will and preservation as ever possible from their fellows of the human species, whereof any action which may constitute harm to a human or humanity not benefiting a greater amount of humans be abstained or abated, and any action which may constitute a service to a human or humanity greater than the amount of humans disserviced by that act be the preference of performance, whereby the life of any single human has value in the utmost comparable only to the lives of a greater amount of humans;

Article II, Opposition

Section I, Idolatry

That no institution could be seen to be so great so as to be emancipated from the conditions which bore it, whereof any quality retained by the former seemingly not present in the latter shall not compose a measure which is novel to the former, but in itself a manifest of the former exceeding their individual capacities in their resolution;

Section II, Representativism

That any form of democracy which does not imply the direct, unfettered will at the essence of the people cannot constitute any valid form of democracy for that people unless their essence is in exodus, for which any act would take merit to reinstate it;

Section III, Partisanism

That any system which creates arbitrary division in the formulation of composite ideative platforms cannot constitute a valid form of reasoning for any purpose which exceeds the mere act of description;

Section IV, Abstraction

That any form or system which endeavors to obscure or arbitrarily divide the capacities of creation such to enable the appropriation of the created at the expense of the creators is a method of Tyranny;

Section V, Absolutism

That even as any theorem may be supposed, it shall not take in itself the hard iron temperament of truth of which it is derivative, but may be at all times bent by relentless contradiction whereof it shall be seen to hold strong or break, wherein it shall be discarded from supposition and made a factor to continuing contradiction, lest it come to impose Tyranny;

Section VI, Alienation

That any form which would pervert nostalgia as action, inhibit the natural enjoyment of the essence of the human species, or otherwise encumber the critical faculties of humanity in the course of its execution is a service to Tyranny;

Section VII, Tyranny

That any form which inhibits the natural expression of sovereignty of the human species, democracy, or detracts from the absolute and utterly uniform expression of such sovereignty is a detriment to humanity in the highest by the loss of refinement in the foreclosure of Dialectic, the loss of sight in the calcification of Ontology, the loss of presence in the perversion of Temporality, the loss of knowledge in the centralization of Epistemology, the loss of freedom in the imposition of Constructs, the loss of truth in the disregarding of Multitudes, and the loss of people in the rejection of Humanism.